Skip to content

PORN AGAIN FUNDAMENTALISTS

April 29, 2022

PORNOGRAPHY is not something men DO to women, it is not illegal nor does it constitute an offence on women (if anything, it is more offensive to those men hopelessly addicted to it’s toxic secret power which always degrades and demeans them, often ruining their lives and that of their families).

BBC Radio Wales’s Sian Lloyd joined Radio Four’s Women’s Hour’s Emma Barnett in whipping up a furiously indignant, deeply disgusted sisterly cloyingly confected and cripplingly compromised reaction yesterday to the news that an MP was “watching” porn on his mobile phone at Westminster and some female MPs had complained though, it appears, not named him (how brave is that, eh, it must have taken such commendable courage for them to anonymously do that! Thank God we have richer working girls at the BBC to fight for fairer pay and conditions and support all these other richer working girls at Westminster doing the same for privileged elites who don’t have to tittilate nor turn anyone on like poorer working girls do).

First we had female journalists appearing to look and sound genuinely absolutely shocked to their core (sounding for all the world like Claude Rains in Casablanca when he discovers gambling is going on in a back room at Cafe Rick’s) when some will go home after their shift to find their mothers, sisters and daughters, brothers, fathers and sons either “trawling” for free thrills on their mobiles or earning a “bit on the side” by setting up a camcorder in the spare bedroom, locking the door and logging on to Chaturbate to have a watched wank which now keeps the bailiffs away and may even settle that escalating gas bill (hard times call for hard measures, sisters, especially when “non-essential” physical contact was outlawed by governments using emergency health and safety powers).

Then, they decided that porn is purely a gender issue and an assault on sisterhood, totally neglecting the inconvenient truth that some of their sexy sisters are doing more than just keeping afloat in these desperately hard times but actually living a life of luxury thanks to wealthy followers constantly adding to their bank balances with generous donations (that, above all, is what incenses the sisterhood……that poor women have always turned to stripping and whipping because it is so effortlessly easy and so endlessly profitable – especially now we have an always-on 24/7 internet).

Were female politicians at our Senedd treated to the same obvious assaults on their modesty and virtuousness, Sian wanted to know, presumably much, much more concerned about the effect this was likely to have on impressionable females seeking a career in politics or journalism than on the sad, inadequate males turning on to be turned on or, of course, the equally sad and inadequate young girls and older women secretly stripping and whipping for cash on porn sites (if we are going to name and shame the MP then surely they should be, too). No effort was made to speak to any male addicts to establish how cripplingly destructive the addiction had been for them nor to establish the effects on their families and friends.

Sian Lloyd spoke to a female spokesperson from the charity Chwarae Teg (Fair Play), who was able to offer only the usual measly platitudes when asked for evidence by saying that porn was now hopelessly endemic – pandemic even – with absolutely no hope of a vaccine and, of course, was completely contagious as our mobile phones and all digital devices are now completely saturated in it (we know that, love, tell us something we don’t know!)

A young woman who had some connection with Plaid Cymru (which, of course, once housed Simon Thomas, who was convicted of viewing child porn though not, presumably, while in Westminster or the Senedd, though he, of course, was not asked to comment to give us some genuinely insightful and illuminating input and ensure balance) also spoke meaningless and vapid twaddle about “calling it out” and “something’s got to change”.

I have never heard such abject misunderstanding allied to such abject misappropriation and misinformation for blatantly political purposes by an entitled elite.

Because pornography is now a “radical feminist” issue and a lethal weapon in the hands of the increasingly potent VAWG, violence to adult women and girls, brigade, the academic research done on it tends to automatically adopt their language and methodology unquestioningly and unconditionally so starts from the perspective that all porn is used mainly by men to victimise and threaten women. Vast numbers of women hugely enjoy the thrills of using it or of cashing in on it secretly.

“There are no official statistics collected regarding the number of individuals accessing pornography in the UK or what proportion of pornography users are male and female. Recent surveys and studies suggest, however, that women’s use of pornography has been under-reported. Although research into
pornography’s impact on society is limited, numerous organisations and individuals are suggesting
negative links, including in relation to: attitudes towards women, low self-esteem, and addiction.” a library note in the House of Commons inform us.

Central to the radical feminist perspective is to make establishing just how many women watch porn incredibly difficult and how many women appear in it even more so. A quick Porn Hub browse on your mobile phone in a private place (preferably not while surrounded by the ever-vigilant sisterhood eager for scalps and while being recorded on international television) will establish that the bigger money is made mostly by younger, more attractive girls (possibly students seeking a safe and controlled way to pay their way through university) who have the largest, wealthiest following and that older males, for instance, are more likely to be paying and following than profiteering and appearing on these porn sites. In some senses, this works as an effective wealth redistribution system to move funds from those who no longer need them to poorer working girls who do.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/661314/gender-distribution-of-pornhubcom-website-traffic-in-selected-european-countries/

Statista tell us that 28 per cent of visitors to Porn Hub in the UK are female, but how would they know if there are “no official statistics”?

And then we have this rather perplexing piece of academic research looking at gender, race and religion.

file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Perry%20and%20Schleifer%20-%20race%20and%20trends%20in%20pornography%20viewership.pdf

“These findings affirm our general theory that Americans who are already more likely to
view pornography than others (blacks compared to whites, men compared to women) would
show greater rates of pornography viewership over time as pornography has become more
accessible and acceptable.”

Wow! Who’d have thought it!

Isn’t a generous, un-threatening, sugar daddy of more use to poorer working girls than a bitter, twisted, rancorous mummy?

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: